Claude Cowork vs ChatGPT Work: Which AI Assistant Actually Gets Work Done?

Claude Cowork vs ChatGPT Work: Which AI Assistant Actually Gets Work Done?

On How to

Plenty of people are already dropping money on the Pro versions of both Claude and ChatGPT. After weeks of serious hands-on testing, though, they keep asking themselves the same question: which one can I actually trust to handle work independently? That's exactly what Claude Cowork and ChatGPT Work promise to deliver. We ran both through identical tasks, and the winner emerged in surprising fashion—plus, you'll finally know which one deserves your subscription money.

What's Inside

• What exactly do these tools do?
• Test 1: Handling recurring tasks like a real coworker
• Test 2: Cleaning up a messy file directory
• Test 3: Building an entire presentation from scratch
• The verdict: Which one should you buy?

What exactly do these tools do?

It's more than just raw speed

Claude Cowork interface open on MacBook

Before deciding which tool wins, we need to understand what each one actually does. The names sound nearly identical, but their approaches to work are fundamentally different.

Claude Cowork is Anthropic's answer to an agentic AI workspace. Rather than asking a question and waiting for an answer, you assign it a task and let it run. It can search local files, process projects across multiple documents, research information online, and integrate with tools like Slack and Teams. It builds documents, presentations, and spreadsheets as it works. Depending on what you ask, a task might finish in minutes or take hours.

ChatGPT Work follows a similar philosophy but pushes further in some directions. You hand over an entire workflow, and it researches, connects apps, uses local files, and completes the job autonomously. It can build websites, schedule recurring tasks, handle repetitive work, and monitor ongoing processes.

Test 1: Handling recurring tasks like a real coworker

Tasks scheduled in Claude Cowork

For a fair comparison, we gave both tools the same three tasks and watched how each one handled them. First up: a simple but practical recurring task. Imagine you need to post a message to a Google Chat group every weekday. Instead of remembering to do it yourself, hand it off to AI.

Claude Cowork went first. We connected it to Google Chat, explained what we needed, and let it run for a week. Surprisingly, it worked perfectly. Messages posted on time during the week, skipped weekends as intended. Then we set up the same workflow in ChatGPT Work. Setup took longer—considerably longer—but once running, the results were essentially identical: messages on weekdays, nothing on weekends.

ChatGPT Work plugins for Google Chat

On paper, that's a tie. Both finished the job well. But the actual experience felt completely different.

• Claude felt collaborative from the start. Before setting anything up, it asked questions, dug into what you actually wanted, and offered multiple options to clarify. It didn't rush. It waited until it really understood the task.
• ChatGPT Work did the opposite. It moved faster initially, yet ironically, total setup time was longer. The back-and-forth was thinner, so you never got the sense it was trying to understand the bigger context behind your request.

What's interesting here is that for recurring tasks, that careful attention matters. Both completed the job, but Claude made you feel confident delegating from day one. Round 1 goes to Claude.

Test 2: Cleaning up a messy file directory

Sorting and renaming files with Claude Cowork

For test two, we wanted to see how each handled data stored directly on the machine. Say you have a folder full of photos that need renaming—exactly the kind of repetitive work people happily hand off to AI.

We gave both Claude Cowork and ChatGPT Work access to the same folder and used identical instructions for each. Then we let them work and watched what happened.

ChatGPT Work nailed it. It understood how you wanted the files named, processed the entire directory, renamed everything correctly, and even sent a notification when done. You didn't have to babysit it or constantly check progress.

Claude Cowork understanding context through clarifying questions

Yes, the process took time. But honestly, for this type of work, nobody cares. When you delegate to AI, you care whether it does the job right, not whether it saves you five minutes. And in this case, it absolutely did the job right. Claude handled the same task beautifully too, with similar quality results. The real concern is that both delivered—which makes round two a draw.

Test 3: Building an entire presentation from scratch

This is where the conversation changed everything

Key points about the presentation in ChatGPT Work

For the third and final test, we upped the difficulty significantly. The task: build a complete presentation from scratch. We provided research data, supporting files, and necessary documents, then gave both Claude Cowork and ChatGPT Work identical detailed instructions. Both started with the same brief. No surprise—neither finished in minutes. The volume of information to process was huge, so both needed time.

Claude Cowork delivered superior results. It followed the template we provided, understood exactly how we wanted information presented, and produced something nearly ready to go. Crucially, like in test one, Claude took time upfront to ensure it understood our needs before diving into work.

ChatGPT Work chatbot on MacBook

ChatGPT Work did finish a presentation, but it had noticeable issues. That meant revisions, additional instructions, and way more back-and-forth than we wanted. When you're constantly correcting mistakes, the entire appeal of delegation evaporates. Real delegation means fewer conversations, not more. The third round wasn't close—Claude Cowork wins decisively.

The verdict: Which one should you buy?

ChatGPT Work objectively has more features. Sites, task scheduling, image generation, and the ability to handle longer, more complex workflows give it genuine advantages. On paper, that's compelling.

But after actually using both? Get Claude Cowork instead. It takes time to understand your needs, clarifies gaps when necessary, and then completes work without constant intervention. That's what you actually want in an AI coworker. At $20/month, Claude Cowork will earn its place in your workflow and convince you to keep paying.

---

Description: We tested Claude Cowork and ChatGPT Work head-to-head across three real tasks. Here's which one you should actually pay for.

Related Articles

• Turn Any Website Into a Podcast Using Copilot in Microsoft Edge
• How to Use DesignArena for Comparing AI Models
• Expand Your Images with Generative Fill in Adobe Photoshop Online
• Specification Engineering: The Next Critical Skill Beyond Prompt Engineering
• Understanding AI Copilot in Dynamics 365: What It Does and Why It Matters

Gemini Now Lets You Create Images by Speaking—No Typing Required

Gemini Now Lets You Create Images by Speaking—No Typing Required

On AI

Forget typing out lengthy, complicated prompts. Gemini Live has just made image creation ridiculously simple—just speak your idea and watch it come to life. Instead of laboriously describing every detail like style, background, clothing, and color, you can now have a natural conversation with Gemini using voice commands. It's a genuinely useful upgrade if you've ever felt bogged down by the need to write perfect text prompts.

What's interesting here is that this voice-powered image creation and editing feature runs on Nano Banana 2, Gemini's image generation technology. Even when you throw a simple, vague idea at it, Gemini Live understands what you mean and delivers surprisingly polished results. So how exactly does voice-to-image work in Gemini Live? Let's break it down step by step.

How to Create Images with Gemini Live Using Your Voice

On the main Gemini interface, tap the Live icon to get started. Once you're in Gemini Live, tap the camera icon to scan an object or subject.

Let's say I want to create a new image of a vase through voice commands. Point your camera at the object, then clearly state what you want to create. Gemini Live will then process your request and generate fresh content based on your instructions.

Changing Style and Appearance

For example:

Make the vase red

The vase will instantly shift to red.

Keep the vase shape but transform it into Japanese-style pottery

Render this image in pencil sketch style

Add a chicken next to the vase

You can also experiment with commands like:

• Transform the vase into minimalist Scandinavian design
• Change the material to clear glass
• Make it look like a luxury home decor piece
• Redesign it in a futuristic style
• Keep the shape but switch the color to cobalt blue

Placing the Vase in Different Environments

Try something like:

Put the vase in a beautifully decorated modern living room

Then continue:

Now place it in a Japanese-style room

And follow up with:

Switch to a vintage-style coffee shop instead

You have complete freedom to move the vase wherever your imagination takes you.

Turning the Vase into a Product Advertisement

Create a magazine cover image for me

Or go more detailed:

Turn this vase into a high-end product advertisement photo—place it on a white marble table with studio lighting and a minimalist background

Then add:

• Add white tulips inside the vase
• Add the text 'Elegance in Every Detail' at the top
• Make it look like a luxury home brand advertisement

Your generated images will appear in the chat conversation when you exit Gemini Live. From there, you can download them.

Tips for Speaking Better Prompts to Gemini Live

Even though you're not typing traditional text prompts, you should still describe the important elements clearly. A simple formula that works:

Subject + setting + style + lighting + details to keep or change

Instead of saying: Make me a nice photo, try: Create a portrait of me in a Parisian café with a cinematic style, warm golden lighting, blurred background, and keep my face unchanged.

This descriptive approach gives Gemini way more context to nail your exact vision.

Google has also upgraded Nano Banana 2 to handle complex instructions better, maintain consistent characters, and render text within images more accurately. That means you can hand it detailed requests rather than just tossing out a one-liner.

---

Description: Say goodbye to long prompts. Gemini Live can now generate and edit images using just your voice. Here's how to master it.

Related Articles

• The Best AI Programming Tools You Should Know About in 2024
• 10 Strategies to Future-Proof Your Career in the AI Era
• Master Claude Projects: Build Your Personal AI Assistant Space
• Google Photos Ask Photos AI vs. Classic Search: Which Photo Finding Tool Works Better?
• The Best AI Meeting Assistants: 5 Tools That Actually Save You Time

Can Gemma 4 Replace ChatGPT for Spreadsheet Analysis? We Tested It

Can Gemma 4 Replace ChatGPT for Spreadsheet Analysis? We Tested It

On How to

Every time Google releases a new open-weights AI model, the internet asks the same question: "Can I use this instead of paying for ChatGPT?" With Gemma 4, that question actually deserves a thorough answer—because for the first time, a free, locally-running model is genuinely capable enough at spreadsheet work to make the comparison meaningful.

We put Gemma 4 and ChatGPT through a series of real-world spreadsheet challenges. Not synthetic test cases, but messy actual data, broken formulas from production environments, and genuine VBA requests pulled from actual projects.

How We Set This Up

For consistency, we ran Gemma 4 (the 27-billion parameter version) locally via Ollama on a standard computer and tested ChatGPT (GPT-4o) through the web interface. Both models received identical prompts, word for word.

We scored each test on three criteria: Did the output actually work? (Does the formula or code run correctly?) How useful was the explanation? (Would a user understand what's happening?) And did it handle edge cases? (Does it account for empty cells, errors, or unusual data patterns?)

Test 1: Data Cleaning—A Messy CSV With Inconsistent Dates and Mixed Formats

The scenario: A 2,000-row CSV export from a legacy CRM system. Dates appear in at least four formats—dd/mm/yyyy, mm-dd-yyyy, yyyy.mm.dd, and plain text like "15 March 2025". Phone numbers mix country codes with local formats. Product names have random capitalization and trailing spaces.

Here's the prompt we gave both models:

I have a CSV with a Date column that mixes dd/mm/yyyy, mm-dd-yyyy, yyyy.mm.dd, and written dates like '15 March 2025'. I need a single formula approach to normalise everything to dd/mm/yyyy in Excel. Also suggest a strategy for cleaning phone numbers that mix +91-XXXXXXXXXX with 0XX-XXXXXXXX formats and product names with inconsistent capitalisation.

Gemma 4's answer was solid. It proposed a nested approach using DATEVALUE combined with TEXT and SUBSTITUTE, and correctly identified that written dates like "15 March 2025" need separate handling. It suggested a helper column strategy—parsing each format using IFERROR and combining them. For phone numbers, it recommended chaining SUBSTITUTE calls to strip dashes and spaces, then using RIGHT to extract the last 10 digits. For product names, it correctly suggested PROPER(TRIM()).

ChatGPT's answer was more polished. It provided a single nested formula using LET to define intermediate variables, making the formula easier to read. It also proactively mentioned Power Query as an alternative—something Gemma 4 didn't. On phone number cleaning, ChatGPT added a warning that certain Indian mobile prefixes could be misinterpreted and suggested a validation step.

Winner: ChatGPT—but not by a landslide. Gemma 4's approach works fine and is production-ready. ChatGPT's answer is more comprehensive, better structured, and shows deeper awareness of real-world edge cases. If you're already familiar with data cleaning strategies, Gemma 4 gives you enough to work with.

Test 2: Pivot Table Logic—Designing and Building Pivot Formulas

The scenario: A sales dataset with Region, Salesperson, Product Category, Quarter, and Revenue columns. We asked each model to propose a suitable Pivot Table layout, then provide SUMIFS formulas for users who need a formula-based approach (common when data updates frequently and you want automatic recalculation).

The prompt:

I have a sales table with Region (North/South/East/West), Salesperson (names), Product Category (Electronics/Furniture/Software), Quarter (Q1-Q4), and Revenue. Suggest a pivot table layout to analyse revenue by region and category, then give me the SUMIFS formulas to replicate this as a formula-based summary table.

Gemma 4 proposed a clear two-dimensional layout with regions as rows and categories as columns—exactly what most analysts want. Its SUMIFS formulas were correct, with proper absolute and relative references. It also suggested adding Grand Total rows and columns using SUM.

ChatGPT created a similar layout but went further. It suggested GETPIVOTDATA for users who prefer actual Pivot Tables, offered SUMPRODUCT as an alternative for older Excel versions, and included formatting tips—color schemes, axis labels, and warnings against 3D charts for executive presentations. It also proposed a filter-based dashboard approach for interactivity.

Winner: ChatGPT. Mainly because of depth and supplementary suggestions that less experienced users find helpful. Gemma 4's core answer is accurate and useful—the SUMIFS formulas work perfectly. The gap here is in "what else should you consider" rather than accuracy.

Test 3: Building VBA Macros—Consolidating Multiple Worksheets

This is where ChatGPT was expected to dominate. It did—but Gemma 4 surprised us.

The task: Write a VBA macro that loops through all worksheets in a workbook (except a "Summary" sheet), copies data from a consistent range (A2 to the last row in column D) on each sheet, and sequentially pastes it into the Summary sheet, adding a source sheet name column.

Gemma 4 produced a working macro. It correctly used For Each ws In ThisWorkbook.Worksheets, included the check If ws.Name <> "Summary", found the last row using Cells(Rows.Count, 1).End(xlUp).Row, and appended data to the Summary sheet. The source sheet name was added to column E. The code ran without errors on our test workbook.

ChatGPT built a more robust version. It included error handling with On Error Resume Next around worksheet operations, added a confirmation dialog at the end showing how many rows were merged, cleared the Summary sheet before writing (with user confirmation), and included comments explaining each section. It also wrapped everything with Application.ScreenUpdating = False for performance.

Winner: ChatGPT—on production quality. Gemma 4's macro works, which is genuinely impressive for a free local model. But ChatGPT's version is what you'd actually want to deploy in a business setting—with error handling, user feedback, and performance optimization. For anyone learning VBA through AI-assisted macro building, both are useful starting points.

Test 4: Chart and Visualization Recommendations

We described a dataset to both models: monthly revenue and customer count for four product lines over two years, aimed at non-technical executives. We asked each model what chart types to use and how to structure the visuals.

Gemma 4 suggested a line chart for revenue trends over time (one line per product), a grouped column chart for comparing product lines by quarter, and a combo chart (line + column) for revenue versus customer count on dual axes. Solid, conventional recommendations.

ChatGPT offered similar suggestions but added sparklines for an executive summary table, a waterfall chart to show year-over-year revenue changes, and specific formatting advice—color palettes, axis label formatting, warnings against 3D charts for exec presentations. It also proposed a dashboard layout with logically ordered charts.

Winner: ChatGPT—on presentation awareness. If you've worked with charts before, Gemma 4's recommendations are perfectly adequate. ChatGPT's advantage lies in design and communication strategy—the kind of advice that separates a technically correct chart from one that actually communicates effectively to stakeholders.

Test 5: Formula Debugging—Diagnosing a Broken Formula

We pasted this broken formula into both models and asked them to identify and fix all issues:

=IFERROR(VLOOKUP(A2,Sheet2!B:F,5,TRUE),"Not Found")+IF(C2>"100",D2*0.1,D2*0.05)

There are multiple problems here: The VLOOKUP match type should probably be FALSE for exact matching; the IF condition compares C2 to the text string "100" instead of the number 100; and IFERROR only wraps the VLOOKUP but the whole expression can still error if the IF part fails.

Gemma 4 caught two of three issues. It correctly identified the TRUE/FALSE match type problem and the text-versus-number comparison in the IF statement. It missed the incomplete IFERROR coverage.

ChatGPT caught all three. It rewrote the formula with IFERROR wrapping the entire expression, changed TRUE to FALSE, removed quotes around 100, and suggested XLOOKUP as a modern alternative for Microsoft 365 users. It also explained why each fix mattered.

Winner: ChatGPT, clearly. Formula debugging requires multi-step reasoning across interacting parts of an expression, and ChatGPT's deeper analysis proved it. That said, Gemma 4 catching two of three is genuinely useful—many users would solve their problem with just those two fixes. For complex formula debugging, though, ChatGPT pulls ahead.

Results Comparison

Task	Gemma 4	ChatGPT	Winner	Notes
CSV data cleaning	Good—effective formulas, sound approach	Excellent—LET formula, Power Query suggestion	ChatGPT	Gemma 4 sufficient for experienced users
Pivot Table logic	Good—accurate SUMIFS, clean layout	Excellent—added GETPIVOTDATA, conditional formatting	ChatGPT	Core formulas equally sound
VBA macro creation	Good—functional macro, basic structure	Excellent—error handling, user feedback, optimization	ChatGPT	Gemma 4 code runs correctly as-is
Chart recommendations	Good—standard recommendations, reliable	Excellent—design advice, dashboard layout	ChatGPT	Gemma 4 adequate for experienced analysts
Formula debugging	Adequate—caught 2 of 3 issues	Excellent—found all 3 bugs, modern alternatives	ChatGPT	Multi-layered reasoning favors ChatGPT
Data privacy and control	Excellent—runs entirely local, no data leaves your machine	Adequate—cloud-based, data sent to OpenAI	Gemma 4	Critical for sensitive business data
Cost	Free	Free tier with limits; Plus at $20/month	Gemma 4	No subscription required, unlimited usage
Speed (after initial load)	Fast on GPU, slower on CPU	Fast and consistent	Tie	Depends on local hardware

Practical Advice

After running these tests and using both models extensively, here's what we'd actually recommend:

Start with Gemma 4 for everyday work. Writing formulas, basic data cleaning logic, simple VBA—Gemma 4 handles all of this well and costs nothing. Install it through Ollama and let it run in the background.

Switch to ChatGPT for complex problems. When you hit something that requires deep multi-step reasoning, code analysis, or production-grade output, move to ChatGPT. The free tier covers most needs; the Plus subscription is worth it if you use it daily.

Use both for learning. Ask Gemma 4 a formula question, then ask ChatGPT the same thing. Compare the approaches. This is genuinely one of the most effective learning strategies available.

Default to Gemma 4 for sensitive data. If you're unsure whether your data belongs in the cloud, the answer is to use a local model. You can always ask ChatGPT again later with anonymized or sample data if you need its extra capability.

The real insight here is that we're finally at a point where "free and local" isn't a consolation prize—it's a genuine alternative for real work. ChatGPT still wins on depth and polish, but Gemma 4 has moved from "interesting experiment" to "actually useful."

---

Description: We compared Gemma 4 and ChatGPT across five real-world spreadsheet tasks. Here's what we found.

Related Articles

• How to Connect Claude Code to Discord Using Claude Code Channels
• The 5 Best AI Tools for Data Analysis in 2026
• Which Coding Agent Wins in 2026? Mistral Vibe, Claude Code, Cursor, and OpenAI Codex Head-to-Head
• How to Use Ask Photos AI on Google Photos: A Complete Guide
• How AI Is Reshaping Entry-Level Job Opportunities for Recent Graduates

How to Link Spotify with Google Gemini: A Complete Setup Guide

How to Link Spotify with Google Gemini: A Complete Setup Guide

On Tech News

Integrating connected apps into Gemini unlocks a significantly better user experience. Once you pair Spotify with Gemini on your phone, the AI assistant becomes your personal music curator. You can search for and play songs, albums, playlists, or podcasts using simple natural language commands—just ask Gemini to "play that Taylor Swift song" or "find me a podcast about technology."

What's interesting here is that you don't need to open Spotify separately to hunt through your library. Gemini handles the heavy lifting for you. Here's everything you need to know about connecting these two platforms.

What Can Gemini Do with Spotify?

Once Spotify is linked to Gemini, you can use voice commands to trigger several actions.

Playing Music

You can ask Gemini to play:

• A specific album.
• A song by a particular artist.
• A Spotify playlist.
• Music that matches a mood, activity, or genre.

Example commands:

1. Play the album [album name] on Spotify.
2. Play [song name] by [artist name] on Spotify.
3. Play my Spotify playlist called [playlist name].
4. Play music for [activity] on Spotify.

Searching for Music

You can request searches for an artist's discography, find songs by lyrics, or discover playlists based on genre, mood, or activity type.

Example commands:

• Find songs by [artist name].
• Find the song with the lyrics "[lyrics snippet]".
• Find me a chill Spotify playlist for relaxing.

Finding and Playing Podcasts

Gemini also lets you search for and play podcasts directly through Spotify.

Example commands:

• Play the podcast [podcast name] on Spotify.
• Play the latest episode of [podcast name] on Spotify.
• Find me a podcast about [topic] on Spotify.

How to Connect Spotify to Gemini

Step 1:

Open Gemini and tap on Your AI Personalizations. Next, select Connected apps.

Step 2:

In the apps list, find Spotify and then enable it. You'll see a connection interface appear where you need to complete the linking process.

After successful linking, you'll see Spotify marked as active and ready to use.

How to Use Spotify on Gemini

Back in the main Gemini chat, type @ in the message box, then tap Spotify to activate it. Now enter your request and wait for Gemini to respond with results.

Keep in mind that Gemini cannot yet perform certain Spotify actions directly through this connection:

• Create new Spotify playlists.
• Create Spotify radio stations.
• Control playback with commands like pause, resume, skip, or go back to the previous track through the Spotify Connected App.

Here's something crucial: Spotify will only play specific songs or podcasts you request if you have a Premium subscription. This means connecting Spotify to Gemini doesn't guarantee that all playback features work the same way on a free account. The real concern is that free users get limited functionality here.

Free account holders can only search for general information through Gemini.

What Can Spotify Free Users Do with Gemini?

There's a significant gap between what Spotify Free and Premium users can accomplish with Gemini.

• Spotify Free: Search for songs, artists, playlists, and podcasts only.
• Spotify Premium: Search capabilities plus the ability to actually play the exact songs or podcasts you request.

1. Find Songs by a Specific Artist

Example: Find all Taylor Swift songs on Spotify.

2. Find Songs Using Lyrics

Example: Find the song with the lyrics "..." on Spotify.

3. Search for Playlists by Genre, Mood, or Activity

Examples:

• Find relaxation music playlists on Spotify.
• Find workout music playlists on Spotify.
• Find jazz music playlists on Spotify.

4. Search for Podcasts by Topic

Examples:

• Find me a podcast about artificial intelligence on Spotify.
• Find podcasts about personal finance on Spotify.

---

Description: Connect Spotify to Gemini and control your music with natural voice commands. Full step-by-step guide included.

Related Articles

• Bkav Unveils BkavGPT: A Vietnamese AI Assistant Tackling Problems OpenAI and Google Haven't Solved
• Microsoft Unveils Windows 11 LTSC 2024 Minimum System Requirements and Supported CPU List
• Getting Started with Artflo AI: Create Images and Videos in One Unified Workspace
• What's That Line Under Your iPhone Battery Icon? Here's Why It Matters
• A Solar Storm Could Cripple the Global Internet

How to Change Gemini Live's Voice to Your Preferred Option

How to Change Gemini Live's Voice to Your Preferred Option

On AI

Gemini Live lets you have hands-free conversations with Google's AI assistant—no typing required. What's particularly useful is that you can generate images using voice commands on Gemini Live without having to type out traditional text prompts.

Beyond that functionality, you have complete control over which voice the assistant uses. Gemini offers multiple voice options depending on your language setting, each with its own unique tone and personality. Here's how to switch voices on your mobile device.

Changing Your Gemini Live Voice on Mobile

Step 1:

Tap the gear icon in the Gemini interface to access settings. Then select Settings from the menu below.

Step 2:

In the settings menu, tap on Gemini Voice to adjust your preferences. You'll see all the available voice options supported for your region and language.

Select a voice to hear a preview, then tap Confirm to apply the new voice to Gemini Live.

Important Notes About Changing Gemini Voices

If you've opened Gemini Settings but can't find the voice change option, there are a few possible reasons. The real concern is that voice options remain limited by language and account eligibility. Google notes that voice customization isn't available for all languages, and you need to be signed into the Gemini app to access this feature.

Here's the good news: you don't need a paid subscription to change voices. Free Gemini users can switch voices too—as long as both your account and language are supported. That said, Google is rolling out Gemini Live updates gradually, so voice options may not be universal yet.

If your account and language meet the requirements but you still don't see the option, make sure your Gemini app is running the latest version from your device's app store.

---

Description: Learn how to switch between different voice options in Gemini Live on your phone with this step-by-step guide.

Related Articles

• Bases: Obsidian's New Plugin Finally Closes the Gap Notion Left Behind
• Master Claude Projects: Build Your Personal AI Assistant Space
• Four Missing Features That Would Make NotebookLM Even Better
• How to Enable or Disable AI Watermarks in Windows Photos
• Talk to ChatGPT Using Your Voice: A Complete Guide

How to Share Gemini Conversations and Manage Public Links

How to Share Gemini Conversations and Manage Public Links

On Tech News

Gemini lets you share conversations with others, turning them into collaborative experiences. Once you generate a shareable link, anyone with that URL can view the entire chat history—and even jump in to continue the discussion. What's interesting here is that you don't need to send the link directly to each person; it works more like a public document. Here's how to share your Gemini conversations and manage those public links.

Sharing Gemini Conversations on Mobile

Step 1:

Open Gemini on your phone and type your question or command. Hit send. Once Gemini responds, look for the share icon below the response.

Step 2:

You'll see multiple sharing options appear on screen. Pick your preferred method—email, messaging apps, social media, whatever works for you. Once the recipient gets the link, they can open it directly to continue the conversation.

Sharing Gemini Conversations on Desktop

Step 1:

Head over to Gemini and have your chat as usual. Find the conversation you want to share and click the share icon.

Step 2:

A menu with sharing options appears. Click Share to proceed.

Step 3:

Now you choose what to share. You can share just a specific message or the entire conversation thread. Make your selection, then hit Create public link. The link automatically copies to your clipboard—ready to paste wherever you need it.

Step 4:

When someone clicks your link, they land on the conversation. To join in, they simply click Continue this conversation.

Managing Your Gemini Public Links

Gemini's public link feature is handy, but you'll want to keep tabs on what's shared. Over time, you might accumulate links you no longer need or want to revoke access to old conversations. Google built in a dedicated management section so you can review, monitor, and delete public links whenever you want.

The real concern is control—once a link exists, anyone with it can view your chat. So managing your shared conversations is essential.

Step 1:

On desktop Gemini, click the settings gear icon and select Your public links.

On mobile, tap the settings gear icon, then Settings. From there, tap Your public links.

Step 2:

You'll now see a complete list of all conversations you've shared on Gemini.

Want to remove a specific conversation from public access? Just click the trash icon next to it.

You'll get a notification that the conversation will no longer be visible to people with the old link. Hit Delete to confirm the removal.

Step 3:

To wipe out all your public links at once, click Delete all links.

Confirm by hitting Delete all to remove every public link you've created.

Important Notes About Deleting Public Links

What happens when you delete a shared link?

Removing a public link triggers several specific changes:

• The link stops working: Anyone who had the link will see an error message saying the conversation no longer exists. They'll be redirected to the main Gemini interface.
• Third-party posts aren't deleted: If you posted the link on Facebook, your website, a forum, or anywhere else online, deleting the link won't remove those posts. You have to manually delete them wherever you shared them.
• Your original conversation stays: Deleting a public link doesn't remove the conversation from your Gemini Apps Activity. If you want to completely erase the chat, you need to delete it separately from your activity history.
• Other users aren't affected: If someone continued the conversation in their own Gemini account, removing your public link won't delete their copy of that chat. They keep their version regardless.

Why do public links disappear on their own?

Sometimes a public link stops working without you doing anything. This happens when the underlying conversation gets deleted from your Gemini Apps Activity. Several things can cause this:

• You manually deleted the conversation from your activity.
• Google automatically deleted it based on your activity retention settings.
• You removed the conversation from your recent chats or unpinned it.

If a public link suddenly stops working, check your Gemini Apps Activity to see if the original conversation is still there. That's usually the culprit.

---

Description: Learn how to share Gemini chat conversations via public links on mobile and desktop, plus how to manage and delete shared links.

Related Articles

• Microsoft Finally Delivers True Native Copilot App for Windows 11 With Practical New Features
• Microsoft Launches Copilot Health to Make Sense of Your Wearable Device Data
• China's First Gaming Billionaire Now Chasing Artificial General Intelligence
• This Android Gaming Phone Just Shattered Smartphone Battery Life Records
• AI Healthcare Adoption Surges: 70% of Medical Organizations Now Deploy AI Systems